Aaron Vanderzwan on Blogger

Monday, December 19, 2005

Logical Demonstration of Something Profound

Find the 3 errors in this symbolic logic proof:


Blogger walawalapb said...

3 errors???? you're giving yourself a little too much credit. First you don't adequately describe your variables, second there are more logical fallacies than drinks I had sunday night and third you don't even have a good grasp of the problem at hand. Starting from the beginning you mention Profound is true but then don't mention what it is or even use it further in your proof. Second, your first statement has no logical backing...it seems to have been pulled directly from your ass. Third setting asside the fact that Flagstun's Principle is neither a real principle nor makes any logical sense whatsoever...it seems to make the proof a lot easier than you made it out to be...oh and have a different result.
2.RoT->SvSP (Aaron's rectum)
3.S->~SP (Flagstun can suck a dick)
4.~SP (1 and 3)
*Notice I didn't really need 2*

Oh I also found it somewhat ironic that you concluded ~S in 12 even though S was assumed...hmmm. Come back when you have at least some familiarity with logic. Q.E.D

1:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

12 is invalid. But Wala, "SP" is simply the statements "something" and "profound" put together. He needs this:
SP (Conjunction)

No need to be so rude.

10:02 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home